Should dccproc always start dccifd?

Gary Mills
Tue Jun 10 00:12:42 UTC 2008

We run dccd along with the dccm sendmail milter.  We also use dccproc
as a sendmail alias to report spam and feed it into an auto-reporter.
I noticed today that dccproc had started dccifd, even though we don't
use dccifd.  The man page does state that this will happen, for the
benefit of SpamAssassin.  We don't use that product either.

Here are the relevant sendmail log entries:

  May 28 17:08:58 electra dccproc[5556]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] try to start dccifd
  May 28 17:08:58 electra sm-mta[5551]: [ID 801593] m4SM8u6o005506: to=|"/usr/local/bin/dccproc -R -t many | /usr/local/sbin/report-spam", ctladdr=<> (1/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=35253, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent

I assume this is harmless, but it raises a couple of questions.  Can
this be prevented?  Is there a more efficient way to handle these
spamtrap aliases?

-Gary Mills-    -Unix Support-    -U of M Academic Computing and Networking-

More information about the DCC mailing list

Contact by mail or use the form.