SpamAssassin, dccifd, and dccproc

Vernon Schryver
Tue Dec 6 14:57:47 UTC 2005

> From: "John R Levine" 

> > I wonder how many installations think they are using dccifd but
> > because they start spamd before dccifd are in fact using dccproc.
> Oops.  I'll drop a note to the spamassassin guys and see if they have a
> suggestion about how to make that more robust.

I'm a big fan of every X operations, checking to see if Y seconds have
passed and if so, rechecking this or that.  If X is >10, the modest costs
of gettimeofday() are amortized into zilch.

Vernon Schryver

More information about the DCC mailing list

Contact by mail or use the form.