why I like DCC but dislike dccproc -t many-rantings (and a few ideas)

Sean Rima sean@tcob1.net
Fri Oct 11 19:37:46 UTC 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Daniel V. Klein stated:

> I'm one of the ones who does #3 - if an email makes it through my
> filters that is obviously spam (e.g., a 419 fraud mail, or "hi, my
> webcam is online", or "brutal rape website"), I just shitcan it for
> the rest of the community by manually reporting it as "many".
> 
> If anyone thinks this is wrong (including Tony!), please tell me.
> 
<AOL mode>
 Me too :)

</AOL mode>

I cannot see anything wrong with doing the -t many to the old rape/web
cam spams. I do not do it for the lists that I am on and that I am
having trouble getting off. I just remove them from my whitelists.

Sean
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GPG for Secure Mail

iD8DBQE9pyfcHMnSWn2nApQRAk1SAKC+kZpddB8qkXHg4bL539iZxs2ElACdGSKN
mwiTvW9v9DnCwzZuFF5L9R4=
=LLk0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
  Sean Rima                                http://www.tcob1.net
  Linux User:      231986          Jabber:   tcobone@jabber.org
  THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.



More information about the DCC mailing list

Contact vjs@rhyolite.com by mail or use the form.