MrC
lists-dcc@cappella.us
Fri Jun 5 16:39:48 UTC 2009
On 6/5/2009 7:10 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed the following irregularity since we replaced 1.3.103 with > 1.3.105 on a NetBSD 4.0 machine (no virtualization): > > Jun 4 16:10:14 dccifd: restart after signal 6 > Jun 4 16:10:14 dccifd: 1.3.105 listening to /var/dcc/dccifd (...) > Jun 4 16:10:14 spamd: dcc: dccifd -> check skipped: failed to read header (...) > Jun 4 18:20:12 dccifd: restart after signal 6 > > > According to kill(1) on NetBSD, signal 6 is ``ABRT (abort)''. What > could that be? It certainly never occured when we used 1.3.103. > I had the same experience, and didn't have time to track the issue. I reverted to dccproc for the time being. I'd be curious about the situation too. Regards, Mike
More information about the DCC
mailing list