John Doherty
jdoherty@gstype.com
Sat Dec 10 05:43:21 UTC 2005
On Friday 09 December 2005 07:21 pm, Vernon Schryver wrote: >> X-DCC-NIET-Metrics: is1.gstype.com 1080; bulk env_From=14 Body=1 >> Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 > Could you check with `ps -wwwwvax | grep dccm` or `ps -lef | grep > dccm` or some other way that dccm is not running with a -t threshold > that would explain it? I mistakenly said earlier that I was not using a -t option, but you're right and "ps -wwax" shows that I am using one. It's what you'd expect from DCCM_REJECT_AT and DCCM_LOG_AT in dcc_conf, though: -t CMN,10,10. I think I've misunderstood the meaning of DCCM_ARGS in dcc_conf: I thought those were the only arguments passed to dccm. Since my DCCM_ARGS doesn't have a -t option, I mistakenly thought it was running without one (and using DCCM_LOG_AT and DCCM_REJECT_AT without being passed those values on its command line). Sorry for that confusion. >> I can't reproduce the problem. I tried sending a couple of dozen >> messages from my home to the shop, and all were accepted just >> fine, though they were checked against a different DCC server >> (X-DCC-Misty-Metrics). > Few if any public DCC servers other than dcc.niet.net run with a > `dccd -K` value that saves env_From checksums. > It should be easy to reproduce the syndrome by adding an entry to > /var/dcc/map biased to dcc.niet.net with > cdcc "add dcc.niet.net RTT-2000 ms" I will try this. My understanding is that this gives a preference to that server, adjusted by -2 seconds to whatever its preference would be anyway, so that it will likely be consulted first. > I've done more testing with something like that and still failed to > get anything to pay attention to the env_From totals. Thanks very much for looking into it. I'll try to make it happen again if I can. -- John
More information about the DCC
mailing list