John Doherty
jdoherty@gstype.com
Thu Dec 8 23:12:23 UTC 2005
On 12/8/05 at 3:21 PM, vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com wrote: >> What I'm seeing is that the env_From count is incrementing for >> every unique, diferent message from the same sender. >> # grep " env_From:" $(grep -l kailacat msg.*) >> msg.3HiJxG: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 11 >> msg.3HiJxT: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 12 >> msg.3HiJxf: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 6 >> msg.3HiJxo: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 7 >> msg.3HiJxv: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 8 >> msg.3HiJxw: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 9 >> msg.3HiJxz: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 10 >> msg.3HiJyi: env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 13 > Where is the "incrementing"? Have you checked the dates on those > log files to find that they should be ordered by the last column? # for i in $(ls -t $(grep -l kailacat msg.*)) ; do grep " env_From:" $i ; done env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 13 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 12 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 11 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 10 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 8 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 9 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 7 env_From: 070d67f5 175c2605 92be632c 27bff934 6 So it seems that each message has an env_From count one higher than the last, except that the messages with counts of 8 and 9 are reversed in the list above. Those two files have time stamps in the same minute (and DCC time stamps in the same second), so ls -t lists them alphabetically. > Or are they messages each sent to 11, 12, 6, 7, 8, ... users? None of these were addressed to more than one recipient. > If each message is sent to one user, which DCC server are you using > that records env_From checksums? All of these have "X-DCC-NIET-Metrics" headers. > If the server you are using is running with -Kenv_From, then it > should count env_From values regardless of body checksum values. OK. > What `dccm -t` thresholds are you using? > Are you using DCCM_REJECT_AT in /var/dcc/dcc_conf? I'm not using a -t argument and am using DCCM_REJECT_AT in the config file. It is set to 10, which I know is very low, but it's been that way for a long time. > Unless you are using `dccm -tALL,X` or `dccm -tenv_From,X`, whatever > the DCC server says about the total for an env_From value should be > ignored. DCCM_ARGS in my dcc_conf is "-U userdirs -SHELO -x -r "<reject message>" (that's not my real rejection message, I just skipped it for clarity). So I'm not using a -t argument to dccm. Thanks very much for your response. -- John
More information about the DCC
mailing list