Dave Lugo
dlugo@etherboy.com
Thu Mar 17 14:22:26 UTC 2005
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Vernon Schryver wrote: > > Yes, the intended targets of those words are organizations that use > private DCC networks to support anti-spam appliances and managed email > services. Mananged email services are what Postini and Brightmail > sell, and apparently what Commtouch itself sold a lot of some years ago. > -- > > Unless I'm mistaken, all of your servers do "provide corresponding > data" to the global network via flooding, albeit some indirectly. > I also think you do not sell managed email services or anti-spam > appliances. If I'm right about that, then future releases of the DCC > will be as free as ever to XS4ALL. > -- > > The restrictions are intended to affect only organizations that offer > anti-spam services and devices in competition with Commtouch. They've > never said so, but I think seems plausible that I am on that list. > I'm not sure then where my employer falls - we provide managed email services (firewall MX service), and we indirectly "provide corresponding data" via flooding. I believe it would still be 'free' for us, can you confirm? -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo dlugo@etherboy.com LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
More information about the DCC
mailing list