Vincent Schonau
vinces@xs4all.nl
Fri Oct 29 15:28:40 UTC 2004
On Oct 29, 2004, at 16:28, Vernon Schryver wrote: >> # 25% of 8 requests ok 10.49 ms RTT 8 ms queue >> wait > >> Note that cdcc claims that dcc1.dcc.xs4all.nl was 'not answering' at >> this time. It most definitely was. A tcpdump of traffic to or from >> 194.109.22.195 from the host that this command was run on, shows no >> packets being sent to that server at all. A random check indicates >> that >> more of our dcc client installations exhibit this behaviour, although >> apparently not all. >> >> Is that intended behaviour? Does this not cause that last server to >> never be picked by the client as the server to send it's reports to? > > How do you figre that the fifth system was in fact answering? Because it looks fine from other hosts, which have dcc1 through dcc5 in a different order in the map. It's not specific to this host; it's specific to the 5th entry in many maps in our client cluster. > Did `cdcc "host dcc1.dcc.xs4all.nl; rtt"` get answers? I had not tried that. That does get an answer: # cdcc 'host dcc1.dcc.xs4all.nl; rtt' dcc1.dcc.xs4all.nl,- anon # * 194.109.22.195,- XS4ALL ID 1118 # 100% of 1 requests ok 50.38 ms RTT 50 ms queue wait > Are you running FreeBSD 4.10? Sorry, I should have specified: $ dccproc -V 1.2.48 $ uname -rmps FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE i386 i386 > This week I finally got around to doing > somet tests with FreeBSD 4.10 and found that UDP socket disconnecting > is indeed newly broken in FreeBSD 4.*. One symptom is that `cdcc rtt` > overlooks all servers after the first one that does not answer. > I will release 1.2.58 with a work-around later today. Excellent; I will try that, then. Thanks, -- Vincent Schonau
More information about the DCC
mailing list