Valentin Chopov
valentin@valcho.net
Tue Feb 10 16:21:49 UTC 2004
Vernon thanks. On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Vernon Schryver wrote: > The only alternatives are to: > > 1. decrease the number of simultaneous mail messages that sendmail > will handle. Depending on the version of sendmail, that's in > the load limiting and load shedding controls usually set in > sendmail.cf. Old versions of sendmail have what I consider > defective controls, but I think recent versions are improved. Maybe you are right that this is the best solution but I don't want to change the sendmail configuration for now ;) > > 2. increase the number of messages that dccm will allow with -j. > This may or may not be possible, dependikng on operating system > limitations such as on open files. Here I have a question . How can I found the current "-j maxjobs", so I can adjust (increase) it. From the dccm manual page I undestand that this is a complex value but is there a way to find it ? > > 3. change the milter setting for dccm in sendmail.cf so that sendmail > will continue instead of "temp-fail. That consists of ensuring > that there is no F=T setting in the Xdcc line in sendmail.cf. > If you use misc/hackmc in the DCC source, simply do not use -f or -R. Here I think that F=, F=T, F=R are working if filter is unavailable or unresponsive only. If the milter returns return something to sendmail, sendmail still returns "temp failing commands" Thanks again, Val == Valentin S. Chopov, CC[ND]P Sys/Net Admin SEI Data Inc. E-Mail: valentin@valcho.net ==
More information about the DCC
mailing list