chris@mikk.net
chris@mikk.net
Fri Jan 23 18:48:56 UTC 2004
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:07:19 -0700 (MST) , Vernon Schryver writes:
> > From: Chris Mikkelson <chris@mikk.net>
>
> > ...
> > as spam. All I need to do is find a way to allow
> > selected addresses (e.g. postmaster, abuse, etc.)
> > to receive the message even if it is being reported
> > as spam.
>
> What is wrong with what dccifd does now when postmaster, abuse, etc.
> are in /var/dcc/whiteclnt?
With the DCCIF_OPT_SPAM option set, dccifd will
always instruct the MTA to reject the message, even
if some or all of the recipients are in /var/dcc/whiteclnt.
I've verified this with dcc-1.2.28, using both
dccif-test and my qmail-queue wrapper.
cat spam | dccif-test -o spam,body -r $whitelisted_rcpt
returns the modified message body, plus:
overall result = R
$whitelisted_rcpt : R
With an already reported message,
cat spam | dccif-test -o body -r $whitelisted_rcpt
returns the unmodified body, with:
overall result = A
$whitelisted_rcpt : A
so my whitelisting is working.
Should the two calls be returning the same thing?
I would like that behavior. I can see the reasoning
behind trusting the MTA's spam determination, but I
can also see some benefit to treating spam being
reported now the same as as spam which was reported
earlier elsewhere.
--
Chris Mikkelson | Slashdot: because a million lemmings can't
chris@mikk.net | be wrong.
More information about the DCC
mailing list