darkmark
darkmark@filament.org
Tue Jul 1 20:25:57 UTC 2003
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> > connect parameter?
> Correct parameter for what purpose?
connect! :)
> Did you read the comments in dcc.m4 file or the sendmail milter
> documentation in light of your needs?
no, but I did search the mailing list archive for this message and changed
this based on a earlier email you had replied too.
--- dcc-archive message below ---
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 07:44:56 -0700 (MST)
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200301221444.h0MEiu0J012243@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: DCC@rhyolite.com, lbolmerg@munichre.com
Subject: Re: Milter timeout message
> From: Bolmerg-Berliner Ludger - Munich-MR <lbolmerg@munichre.com>
> I have found a couple of entries like the following in my maillog file.
> Come somebody explain what they mean. I am currently using dccm 1.1.16
and
> 1.1.17. There is no local dccd running. dccm is using the public dccd
> servers.
>
> Jan 22 04:47:39 netserv2 sm-mta[52129]: h0M3lXGr052129: Milter (dcc):
> timeout before data read
> Jan 22 04:47:39 netserv2 sm-mta[52129]: h0M3lXGr052129: Milter (dcc): to
> error state
They mean that sendmail got tired of waiting for dccm to answer.
I think the default timeouts from misc/dcc.m4 in the DCC source are
5 and 30 seconds. Perhaps the initial timeout should be increased
to 30 seconds. That can be done by changing a line like
Xdcc, S=unix:/var/run/dcc/dccm, F=T, T=C:5s;S:5s;R:5s;E:30s
to
Xdcc, S=unix:/var/run/dcc/dccm, F=T, T=C:30s;S:5s;R:5s;E:30s
in sendmail.cf
Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com
--
Mark Atkinson
darkmark@filament.org
(!wired)?(coffee++):(wired);
More information about the DCC
mailing list