Vernon Schryver
vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com
Wed Jan 22 19:55:34 UTC 2003
> From: Sean Rima <sean@tcob1.net> > > Xdcc, S=unix:/var/run/dcc/dccm, F=T, T=C:30s;S:5s;R:5s;E:30s > Is there a similar method for dccproc The timeouts for sendmail waiting for a response from the local DCC client are a different sort of thing than the timeouts of a DCC client waiting for a DCC server. Sendmail's milter timeouts to a (usually) local milter are fixed, and probably should be. The DCC client timeouts are adaptive and depend on the average RTT to the distant DCC server beyond the Internet horizon. When things are working, your DCC client should not need to wait more than 0.5 seconds. Only when a local PPP or other slow speed link is stalled by congestion or modem retraining are multi-second delays reasonable. Recent versions of the DCC client code can wait several seconds for before giving up, assuming the previously preferred DCC server has died, and trying with a new IP address. (There are currently 8 IP addresses for `dcc.dcc-servers.net.) That process might make 5 seconds too short. > as I sometimes get: > > Jan 22 18:17:08 tcob1 dccproc[29273]: no answer from > dcc.dcc-servers.net (203.147.165.193,6277) after 12015 ms > Jan 22 18:17:28 tcob1 dccproc[29308]: no answer from > dcc.dcc-servers.net (203.147.165.193,6277) after 12024 ms > Jan 22 18:17:41 tcob1 dccproc[29320]: no answer from > dcc.dcc-servers.net (203.147.165.193,6277) after 12011 ms If no DCC server has answered your DCC client after 12 seconds, and in this particular case, apparently after 3 consecutive 12 second waits, then waiting even longer is like to be a waste of time. Isn't this problem you see the same that you've had for a long time and that I've speculated is an IP routing or PPP interface configuration problem? Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com
More information about the DCC
mailing list