Trevor Astrope
astrope@e-corp.net
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:00:20 -0400 (EDT)
Hello, Sorry for causing problems... I installed dccproc to use with spamassassin, as it is a requirement, and was unaware that it was causing these problems. It did appear to be working well at first, but I now see a lot of dccproc connection refused messages in the logs. It is a fairly busy mail server and we do get a lot of spam to harvested addresses from our web site. I appologize for the lack of info for e-corp, as the domain has changed to sitesell.com, but the server names were not changed. I've disabled the dcc checks in spamassassin and appologize for any problems this has caused. I did not intend to abuse the service. I have no idea why the client is sending the bad data. Regards, Trevor Astrope astrope@e-corp.net On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Vernon Schryver wrote: > Does anyone know anything about e-corp.net or > Goodbytes Information Products Inc > > I am seeing DCC traffic from 216.95.221.3 or server2.e-corp.net > that could be considered abusive. It consists only of zillions of DCC > NOP operations. > > There are some other hosts that do almost as much. > > I wonder if the cause might be the recently advertised PC code. I > suspect that code lacks the shared map file containing RTTs and other > information of the proper DCC design, and as a consequence, every > operation involves a round of RTT measuring. The result of that is > currently a 6 fold increase in the load imposed on the public DCC > servers by that software compared to a proper design. When more public > DCC servers are available, the problem will be worse. > > What countermeasures are appropriate? > > > Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com >