Michael Ghens
michael@spconnect.com
Mon Jul 15 06:30:27 UTC 2002
Just the usual error message: result: mail from ::ffff:66.216.91.13 in msg.1EIfan rejected by XXXX DCC targets: spam On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Vernon Schryver wrote: > Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:47:20 -0600 (MDT) > From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> > To: dcc@rhyolite.com > Subject: Re: sendmail: dccdnsbl v dnsbl > > > From: Michael Ghens <michael@spconnect.com> > > > Strange, at the day job, dccdnsbl does not block anything, but dnsbl does. > > On my consulting server, there are no problems with dccdnsbl. > > > > I have tryied dccdnsbl.m4 with and without the 5 dnl lines, no change. > > > > Only difference is that the day job server is a store & forward on the > > firewall DMZ and uses a procmail filter for bad mime. The DMZ box is a rh > > runing Sendmail 8.11. > > I don't understand how procmail fits into things, but maybe it > doesn't matter for this problem. > > The official dnsbl feature turns on DNS blacklist rejecing, while > the DCC dccdnsbl feature turns on DNS blacklist reporting to the DCC while > leaving the DCC to do the rejecting. > > Dccm log files on the day job server should have some clues. What do > they have to say about dccm's disposition of messages marked as spam > by sendmail with a DNS blacklist? > > > Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com > _______________________________________________ > DCC mailing list > DCC@rhyolite.com > http://www.rhyolite.com/mailman/listinfo/dcc >
More information about the DCC
mailing list