Earl A. Killian
earl@killian.com
Mon, 6 May 2002 11:53:16 -0700
Jeff Wiegley, Ph.D. writes: > Date: 06 May 2002 11:44:41 -0700 > From: "Jeff Wiegley, Ph.D." <jeff@cyte.com> > > I like the idea of saving spam for reasons of accountability, > prosecution and intrusion detection. The -l option of dccproc does that. > But I would rather my sendmail respond to spam requests with a > ERROR:"550 We don't accept mail from lower-than-dirt spammers" > so that they get the message. They probably won't ever see the message. However, rather than the above, you might consider something more legalistic, since you mention prosecution above. For example, give a URL to a web page with your unsolicited bulk email policy, which states that they owe you $500 per message, or something. Like shrinkwrap software licenses, you could try to assert that by sending mail to your site, they have accepted your policy. -Earl