Vernon Schryver
vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:16:17 -0700 (MST)
> From: <Kstone@win.net>
> ...
> dccproc 1.0.43 clearing database /var/dcc/dcc_db
>
> Jan 30 12:18:06 hostname dbclean[6560]: 1.0.43 clearing database /var/dcc/dcc_db
> hashed 209 records containing 209 checksums, compressed 0 records
> ...
> Jan 30 12:18:28 hostname dccd[6594]: query: bad hash list entry at 0x1eab
> ...
> An offline clean and on-line clean remedies the problem temporarily in the
> DB.. This can be verified by performing a dccproc -Q. No error messages
> are displayed and the values look proper. Remove the -Q, and the above
> error messages occur again. This is a machine that .42 works perfectly
> on. Any ideas?
I am unable to reproduce that problem on a system where uname says
"4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0"
I've tried the sample white lists from both 1.0.42 and 1.0.43 without
getting the same number of checksums. Therefore, perhaps the problem
is related to the particular contents of /var/dcc/whitelist and any
files it includes such as /var/dcc/whitecommon In case that's the
trick, then I'd apprieciate a copy of the white lists by private email.
Have I assumed correctly that there are no modifications to any part
of the DCC source? And that neither dbclean nor dccd have been stopped
prematurely such as with SIGINT?
`dblist -vvvv | more` will dump such a small databaset all in
a short time (unlike what dblist does on a few 100 MBytes).
There ought to be some kind of error message or other oddity in
the hash table bin labeled "1eab"
I guess I ought to document that stuff. The hash table is dumped as
index: forward_index reverse_index [ptr-to-rcd cksum-type]
In this case I get these prefectly reasonable results:
...
1eaa: 1eac 1ea9
1eab: 0 0 20ac From
1eac: 1ead 1eaa
...
Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com