Vernon Schryver
vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com
Sat, 26 Jan 2002 20:28:03 -0700 (MST)
> From: John Payne <john@sackheads.org> > > (minor details like the arg letter "-a" and tag "adhoc" to be fixed) > > Yes, that would work. I also like making use of the List-Id tag :) Ok, I'll think about it. I hope you don't mean to use "list-id" instead of "adhoc", because the "adhoc" or whatever string must apply to all of the locally special headers. It won't be for perhaps a week, because I need to look into an improvement for procmail+dccproc problem Michael Ghens has mentioned, and that after documenting the improvements for larger servers. > BTW - i noticed for somereason that From: john@sackheads.org has been > added to the shared DCC pool as "many"... I sent you some postfix stuff > during the week, and you haven't been as responsive as normal, so I was > wondering if I'm being dropped by your MTA :) I've kept a note about support for postfix, but it didn't seem to need me to do anything. I'm sorry if I misunderstood. Between various kinds of plumbing problems, I've been very busy profiling and hacking. I don't see any counts for either 74c354b2 71f94b5a 6de252c6 d92b8049 or 71ca22ec 308773e6 7471ca58 fb307967 (`cdcc "pck from some@address"` and `cdcc "pck from whatever <some@address>"` followed by `dblist -v | grep -B3 -A9 '71ca22ec 308773e6 7471ca58 fb307967'`) If either had been flooded to my sever or had been tagged "many" from before 1.0.44, they'd be here. They're not here at all because the 1.0.44 server doesn't keep non-body checksums from client in the database and the old counts have been expired. Non-body checksums are kept if flooded in or if set in the server whitelist. Where do you see the "many"? Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com