Francois Baligant
francois@be.wanadoo.com
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:05:22 +0100 (CET)
Ok, I didn't setup DCCM_CKSUMS nor DCCM_XTRA_CKSUMS
so Im rejecting because of Fuz1=many.
From what I can read in the source, the decoded
body of the email is 'compressed' (remove punctations, spaces)
and then a checksum is calculated.
Won't all empty messages produce the same checksum
and so push it until it reaches 'many' ?
Im right or is the calculation different ?
regards,
Francois
--
Francois Baligant _ Wanadoo Belgium NV/SA,
Network Operation Center ( ) a subsidiary of France Telecom
/_\/ Lozenberg 22 - B-1932 Zaventem
francois@be.wanadoo.com (__/\ tel: +32 2 717 17 17
FB1-6BONE FB3122-RIPE fax: +32 2 717 17 77
- "if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c?"
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> > From: Francois Baligant <francois@be.wanadoo.com>
>
> > Is there a way to not reject email based on the Subject ?
> > I have many customers sending email with "test" or "Re:" and
> > they get rejected because the subject is flagged as "many":
> >
> > X-DCC-wanadoo-be-Metrics: ev6 1016; IP=13 env_From=1 From=1 Subject=many
> > Message-ID=1 Body=1 Fuz1=many
>
> Dccm rejects mail only if you set the rejection thresholds low enough,
> such as with DCCM_REJECT_AT=XX in /var/dcc/conf.
> By default only the Received, Body, and Fuz1 checksums are used to
> reject mail when you set DCCM_REJECT_AT. The other checksums are
> not reliable indications of "bulkness."
> Subject checksums matter only if you set DCCM_CKSUMS or DCCM_XTRA_CKSUMS
> in /var/dcc/dcc_conf or otherwise use "-t subject,X,Y".
>
>
> I'm considering removing the Subject checksum when I add support
> for the new Fuz2 checksum realsoonow. (but I've been saying that
> for more than a month)
>
>
> vjs
> _______________________________________________
> DCC mailing list
> DCC@rhyolite.com
> http://www.rhyolite.com/mailman/listinfo/dcc
>