Vernon Schryver
vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:17:35 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "Mediratta, Bharat" <bharat@fusionone.com> > ... A binary distribution > with a configuration wizard would greatly ease the pain. Binary for how many versions of how many platforms? In other words, if you need a binary for one of more than half-dozen targets I current build for, then I can help, but probably not otherwise. > I further think that we'd start to see some serious penetration if > we made a plug-in for the common mail readers that people could just > drop into their system. Is this where the MAPS DCC pilot is heading? The long term plan is to support more platforms. I'm not sure about "plug-ins", what with Microsoft's new found opposition to Netscape style plug-ins and my ignorance of Exchange. > ... > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C13456.CB4A4AC0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> > <HTML> > <HEAD> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> > <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"> > <TITLE>RE: DCC -- how do I effectively use it?</TITLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY> > > <P><FONT SIZE=2>> From: Brian J. Murrell [<A HREF="mailto:dcc-list@interlinx.bc.ca">mailto:dcc-list@interlinx.bc.ca</A>]</FONT> > ... Some people think that sending both plaintext and HTML encoded versions of a single message is not good. Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com