Gustav Foseid
gustavf-dcc@initio.no
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:25:28 +0200
Vernon Schryver: > > I am interested as soon as I get my system out of testing. But before that > > is going to happen, I am going to have a life and have couple og weeks of > > vacation :-) > > It wouldn't be sane to delay a vacation or not live a life just to deal > with spam, but in my book, "testing" is as close to real life as possible. > If you don't have an incoming feed of checksums, and if that's how you > intended to run it, then I don't see how whatever is happening now is > testing. Maybe "preliminary smoke testing," but not "testing." First of all, my clients do still not use DCC for actual filtering of e-mail. In my book that goes as testing. And I have not found a way to build a whitelist. > Note that there are good. although less common reasons to run an > isolated DCC server that neither sends nor receives flooded reports, > as well as cases where only output or only input flooding makes sense. I have a spamtrap that I could flood to others now. -- Gustav Foseid, Initio IT-løsninger AS gustavf@initio.no